Citizen. Speak. Amplify.

Amendments to basic education law not “school capture”

The department of basic education (DBE) has been accused of trying to “capture schools” after proposing an amendment to basic education laws. Among other things, the Basic Education Laws Amendment Bill aims to curtail the powers of school governing bodies.

The Norkitt Education Leadership Initiative (Neli), an NGO working to improve school governing bodies (SGBs) has argued that if these amendments pass, they disempower SGBs and gives the education department unchallenged oversight of schools. “[T]he spirit of the amendment… excludes vital stakeholder input and oversight from our schools,” said Neli in a statement.

Friday, November 10, was the last day for interested parties to submit comments on the bill.

The National Professional Teachers’ Organisation of South Africa (Naptosa) has called the bill autocratic. “The proposals in its current form are dictatorial and undemocratic,” it said.

The department has proposed in the amendment bill that provincial heads of department take over the role of appointing staff and principals from the bodies. “If the amendment is accepted, a governing body will be able to recommend to the Head of Department,” read the amendment bill.

The Democratic Alliance’s (DA) shadow education minister, Ian Ollis, also expressed concern over this proposed move. Ollis told The Daily Vox the bill would put pressure on the heads of department to make staffing decisions for schools in communities they may not know much about. “I don’t think the SGB powers should be reduced,” he said. “We really need to see proper capacitation of SGBs rather than removing their power.”

The proposed amendments would also see schools reviewing their language policies every three years. But Ollis argues that this would burden SGBs with expensive and complicated procedures involving public consultation every three years. He suggested that the proposed tri-annual reviews for schools that are struggling with their language policy would be more practical.

These amendments are however just proposals for now, and aren’t an attempt at stripping all SGBs of all their power, said retired provincial DBE director of business strategy, Anne Schlebusch. She told The Daily Vox that the department is aware of the importance of community involvement in education. “I wouldn’t imagine that the state really wants to turn its back on community involvement in schools,” she said.

Schlebusch said these amendments had to be made because there were changes in some laws that required amendments to be made on the bill, and the department of higher education and training had taken over some the DBE’s functions. “What the department has done so far is say look, these are the issues that interfere with our options to ensure a solid education,” she said.

Schlebusch said the intention of the department will be to intervene only in schools with dysfunctional SGBs. She said the DBE is amending the SGB’s power to wrest some sort of control to deal with chaotic schools. “Their ability to intervene is limited because so much authority is vested in the school governing bodies,” she said. “I would doubt that the department would have the will to start with interference in schools that are doing fine.”

With the window for public comment closed, the next step is for the bill to be amended by the minister, and then be be placed before Parliament.

Featured image via Wikimedia Commons
2 Comments
  1. Henry Author Price Jr. says

    comrades if we keep sight of ultimate goal which should be to give a world class education ( instill modern methods knowledge plus feed) with those providing education plus its relevance duly paid then we are obligated irregardless of likes plus dislikes to do what is legal plus cost efficiently correct. Very much sincere, Henry Author (people of books) Price Jr. aka Obediah Buntu IL-Khan aka Kankan aka Gue.

  2. West Men says

    I suppose retired provincial DBE director of business strategy, Anne Schlebusch, has a point, SGBs will still have the power to raise funds for the school.
    Secondly, the deadline for comments was 10 November 2017, but the DBE will apparently still receive and accept submissions while it reads through the 6 000+ emails it received up to the end of last week.
    Moreover, the Gauteng MEC for Education is frantically appealing to the Minister of Basic Education to extend the deadline so that more favourable comments on the BELA bill can be submitted.
    Lastly, read the bill for yourself, it is fraught with abuses of power, from unconstitutional provisions, to violations of the Bill of Rights, to arbitrary law-making and, yes, imprisoning parents for up to 6 years should they not want their children to attend the public school system.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.