#NoHijabDay: Sorry white feminists, it’s not about you


Twitter is awash with comments about #NoHijabDay, a supposed international day of solidarity inviting “all men and women, non-Muslim and Muslim” to not wear headscarves as part of observing hijab  – the Islamic practice of dressing modestly, on 11 October. AAISHA DADI PATEL unpacks the significance, if there is any.

Not all Muslim women cover their hair in the first place, and the remaining people invited to take part in the campaign – men and non-Muslim women – wouldn’t be wearing it anyway. Basically this is a campaign asking everyone who wears a headscarf, whatever their personal reasons, not to do so.

It could almost be a joke but it isn’t. And people haven’t taken kindly to it. Some have argued that this is just the latest in a series of moves in which white, Western feminists – a la Femen – try to “save” Muslim women and liberate them from the oppression they believe hijab signifies.

It’s also brought Islamophobes out of the woodwork in droves.

Many Muslim women who do observe hijab have taken offense to the campaign and a counter hashtag – #HijabAppreciationDay – to post pictures of themselves in their hijab.

When you look at where the call for the movement originates, a bit more context comes into the picture. The campaign was started by Iranian journalist Masih Alinejad back in 2014. Alinejad started a Facebook page inviting women in Iran to post pictures of themselves without their headscarves on in defiance of Iranian law, which states that all women must observe hijab.

Alinejad was advocating for Muslim women to have the freedom to choose whether to wear the hijab for themselves. Inevitably, white feminists have misappropriated Alinejad’s movement to build on a narrative of Islamophobia and perpetuate moral panic around the practice of hijab. In case they missed it, Muslim women are perfectly capable of pursuing feminist ideals themselves.

– Featured image via Rob Hogeslag on Flickr.

Enjoyed reading this piece? Help us to keep doing what we do by donating to our crowdfunding campaign here.



  1. Does the author have ANY idea about what Femen is? I recommend to read a bit before offending others with no explanation!

  2. Why don’t you stop speaking for “white feminists” and do some research. Do you know what the fuck Femen is and what it stands for? Apparently not.
    Funny how you couldn’t find any evidence to back up your article. You called an ex Muslim an “Islamophobe” (I think that if anyone should have the right to criticize a religion without being called a bigot, it should be somebody who knows it, has lived it, and left the faith!). You also didn’t bother to ask feminists of ALL races what they think. You actually sound *quite* racist. Oh, I know…women with brown skin can’t possibly be racists.
    Let me give you a clue on what a white feminist thinks (if you care, which you don’t but maybe I can save someone out there from ignorance ): feminism is about CHOICE. A woman’s choice to wear the hijab should be respected. A woman’s CHOICE to go outside topless should also be respected. A woman, hijab or no hijab, is not responsible for being “covered” in order to keep men from being tempted to sin, which is a part of the basis for why some Islamic countries mandate hijab. So…celebrate whatever it is you’re wearing. And stop dividing feminists by race…you’re becoming the very thing you hate!

    • “white feminism” is like “intersectional feminism”. it refers to a kind of feminism constructed to benefit white people and ignoring or actively damaging other women.

  3. Why do you use white feminists? More appropriate is western feminist. Do you that lots of Muslims are white and feminists are brown, etc? It is quite stupid article like i would write about arrange marriage.

    • white feminism is feminism primarily concerned with white people. when we say intersectional feminism, do you assume it means feminism that is only believed by intersectionals?

  4. This article is a bad joke…and yes the # ohijabday concerns all women, no matter what colour or religions.it is about the freedom of every women…even if the author wants to put others in chains, it is against human rights. And it seems the author is afraid of the power of white women who want to help others to be free.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here