Why is Scarlett Johansson in Ghost in the Shell?

Hollywood is known for its habit of whitewashing characters that were never supposed to be white. The hashtag #OscarsSoWhite brought attention to the issue around race when all of the 2016 Oscar nominees were white. The latest example is with casting Scarlett Johansson as a Japanese character in the live-action adaptation of Ghost in The Shell. DANA DA SILVA rounds up the controversy around the casting choice and why they should’ve cast an Asian actress.

ScarJo is a pretty good actress. Her stints in Lucy and as Black Window in the Avengers proved that she is a capable action star. But the role that we weren’t expecting to see her in (and that we didn’t really want to see her in) was as Major Motoko Kusanagi in the 2017 live-action adaptation of the anime classic Ghost in the Shell.

For all of you who don’t know what it is (which you should because it’s a classic), Ghost in the Shell is a manga (comic) which spawned an animated movie and series. The manga was originally released in 1989 and the first animated movie that was made from the manga came out in 1995.

The story is set in 21st century Japan and follows the members of a special-operations task-force called Public Security Section 9. Major Motoko Kusanagi is a cyborg leading the elite police task force. She is badass, powerful, super smart and is well known for her hacking skills.

Knowing ScarJo’s past work she could probably pull off a character like Major Motoko. But this isn’t a question of whether or not she has the goods to do a great Major. Being a badass character, that can kick butt, is just one part of Major’s character.

There are many Asian actresses who could’ve easily pulled off Major’s badassery. Rinko Kikuchi (Pacific Rim), Chiaki Kuriyama (Kill Bill: Volume 1) and Karen Fukuhara (Suicide Squad) are a few of my personal favourites. In fact, two Asian actresses themselves, Ming-Na Wen and Constance Wu, protested the casting of Johansson in the role.

My issue is that the character is clearly supposed to be Japanese, as the story itself is based in 21st century Japan. Last time I checked, ScarJo wasn’t Japanese. When you look at the manga it engages largely with themes that Japan was facing in the 1980s.The manga was released in an era where Japan was considered the world leader in technology. The manga, animated movie, and series play off of these tech themes.

Comic book writer Jon Tsuei argues, in a series of tweets, that Ghost in a Shell is also an intrinsically Japanese story.

The fact is that it is a work of science fiction that is clearly Japanese, and to Westernise it would take away from the story.

In the face of all this backlash Paramount tried to use CGI to make ScarJo look more Asian just to quell the backlash. What the hell?! If they want to make her look more Asian, then why didn’t they cast an Asian actress for the role in the first place? Luckily, the idea was scrapped before they could make any real changes.

via GIPHY

This is just another example of Hollywood trying to whitewash everything, plain and simple. Even in 2015, we had saw it in movies such as Exodus: Gods and Kings, where the cast was supposed to be Egyptian, and in Pan, where a white actress was cast as Tiger Lily, a well-known Native American character.

Others have also come out in criticism, pointing out that this is whitewashing.

Basically, Paramount is trying to bank on Johansson’s action star status being the main the reason why so many people will go watch the movie. With the backlash that the producers have received, maybe it’s time that Hollywood stops worrying about bringing in the money and starts focusing on telling the story instead? At this rate, it feels like too much to ask.

Featured image via Twitter

You might also like More from author

4 Comments

  1. SPark says

    I am actually sick and tired of having Scarlett Johansson shoved down my throat. She is an OK actress, but not that great. I tend to watch every SciFi movie that comes out, but I am boycotting this one.

    Also, I think Hollywood has not caught on that the Asian-American buying power is the highest per capita in this country, and equivalent to the African-American buying power. Why do Asian-Americans get less than 1% of lead roles then? There are a ton of Asian-Americans living in LA, many of which end up moving to Asia due to lack on roles in the U.S. Plus, a recent UCLA study found that more diverse movie casts bring in more box office revenue.

    Hollywood acts as if the U.S. is a white nation, when only ~62% of this country is white. White men make up only~30% of the U.S. population, but get 86% of the lead roles. Jewish men make up 1% of the U.S. population, but get ~20% of the lead roles. Do Jewish men really increase box office revenue? Nothing against Jews, but perhaps nepotism is the real factor at play?

    1. Roberto says

      Lucy is the reason Johansson was cast, it was an original IP that made some serious bank and the director owned the studio that made it. Film Studios have become very risk adverse in our over-saturated media market so they want a sure thing if they’re going to be dropping north of $150m on a single project.

      I’m not defending yellowface here but as a planet we’re going to have make more mass audience friendly films featuring African and Asian faces and that is going to have to come from the independent sector.

      On a sidenote having a white actor play a Japanese character whose consciousnesses happens to be inhabiting a full body prosthesis could offer an opportunity comment and satirize how “whiteness” is seen as a higher social standard.

    2. Aetas says

      Ask Brazil because I really don’t give a shit.

  2. Boogieman7167 says

    The reason Scarlett got the roll was that the she the Suppior actress and the one they believe can make the film the most success and $$ . if they believed that another actress would bring the movie more success they would have cast that other actress for the part if she was Japanese or not .

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.